Last Sunday the second series of
Sherlock came to a dramatic close on BBC. The cat and mouse struggle between Jim Moriarty (Andrew Scott) and Sherlock (wonderfully portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch) was turned on its head as Holmes was given a morbid decision of taken his own life to save his loved ones’.
The BBC series was created in 2010 by Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat (who plays Holmes brother Mycroft) in the hope of not only modernising Sherlock but also to bring back the deductive, although more precisely “inductive”, aspect to the story. Over the previous century many portrayals of the Sherlock series were heavily interpretation based and usually skipped over the detecting aspect of story but the current series aimed to tick both boxes and did so quite well.
The episode on Sunday that went out to 16 million British viewers saw many of the themes that occur in the Arthur Conan Doyle’s books. For one the episode touched quite warmly on the friendships Holmes has and Dr Watson (Freeman), Mrs. Hudson (Una Stubbs), and DI Lestrade (Rupert Graves). Particularly in the former case the bond between both men was brought from the comical sense that it had always been depicted as to a more serious and, embarrassing enough, tear jeering way. If Martin Freeman knows anything it’s how to play emotion with looking awkward and uncomfortable.
Another convincing motif of the Sherlock genre was the portrayal of Moriarty and his interaction with Holmes. One of the best features of first series was casting the villain as unknown actor. This played up much to the unpredictable characteristic of Moriarty and gave the series a much more “edge of seat” feel. It did seem rather strange at first to have Moriarty rather suave and Irish but playing with the modern element an Irish consulting terrorist does make it seem authentic and the idea of Britain’s greatest detective being upended by an Irishman does have many patriotic tones for viewers on both side of the water.
…and then the cliff hanger. It’s always interesting to see how people take the demise of both characters. Before it all ends Moriarty evil intellect falls down to nothing more than gifted brutality mixed with master planning and all of a sudden Moriarty’s sense superior intellect is turned on its head. I too like many other viewers from Sunday night thought that his expiry was too shift but it did feed in well to the psychopath concept that the modern version plays at with Moriarty. Arthur Doyle’s Sherlock sacrifices his life, or seems to, for the greater good but Sunday night’s episode saw Moriarty take his own to destroy Sherlock’s. Truly a desperate, twisted mind.
The BBC had commissioned for a third series when they commissioned for the second but unfortunately we wouldn’t get to find out how Sherlock conceived his fake suicide till the start of 2013 at the earliest. If you want to watch it all again the DVD of the series comes out on the 23 of this month and like my speculating below you can try to figure out Sherlock did it.
How did Sherlock do it?
The Evidence: From the audience’s perspective we see the outline of Sherlock from behind standing on the ledge hanging up his phone and dropping it. After a short cut to Watson we go back to a Sherlock jumping off the building. We then see a long shot of a body, which appears to be Sherlock, falling. Next what we see is are only the pair of somebody’s legs hitting the ground from a height that can only be presumed as higher than the camera’s view point. Watson, whose view of the ground area is obscured by a small building, begins to run over to Sherlock. Before he is knocked over by a cyclist and disorientated we see head of a body lying in the ground whilst the rest of the body is obscured by a lorry with green and white bags in its back compartment.
Cutting to a bird’s eye view of Sherlock’s body we see the lorry pull away. Returning to Watson now on the ground, we see scores of doctors surround the body. Finally we see Watson make his way through some of the doctors to take the pulse of a dead body and while the camera shows the head of what appear to be a longer haired individual resembling Sherlock.
Whilst on the phone to Watson, Sherlock turns around to look at Moriarty’s corpse which is still on the roof. Now from earlier in the episode we come across the hanging mannequin for the case of the suicide of Henry Fishguard. We also know that the American Ambassador’s daughter is under the illusion that Sherlock was the man is who kidnapped her so there very small hint of Moriarty hired/created a double of Sherlock, although I doubt this is very likely. The main point it that we are definitely led to believe that Molly helps Sherlock in whatever happened. It is also acceptable to consider that Sherlock arranged the cyclist to knock over Watson to bide more if there is a switch.
Sherlock jumped of the building into the back of the truck whilst Molly pushed a cadaver from the morgue out a lower window which was obscured from Watson’s view. This would play into Watson seeing Sherlock’s dead head and the no pulse and Watson maybe presumed that he sees Sherlock if the cadaver has any similar features to Sherlock.
Strengths: Plays into the pulse of dead person.
Weaknesses: Doesn’t explain why the cyclist knocks over Watson nor does it explain that we see Sherlock’s head lying on the ground.
Theory 2: Sherlock jumps of the building into the back of the truck. He then climbs out of the back of it to falls onto the ground. While Watson lies on the ground, accomplices to Sherlock at ground level help Sherlock in creating the impression that he’s dead.
Strengths: Brings into account Molly and the hypothetical cyclist idea.
Weaknesses: Doesn’t explain the dead pulse. More accomplices on ground level means it’s a harder plan to pull off as may start to wonder what’s going on.
Theory 3: Sherlock jumps into back of truck while Molly pushes Moriarty’s body off the building afterwards. Sherlock jumps out of the truck while Watson is being knocked over and switches his body with Moriarty’s.
Strengths: Creates the gruesome blood splatter for Sherlock to imitate. It also disposes of Moriarty’s body.
Weakness: A lot of switching on the street. Doesn’t explain the pulse Watson checks.
There are many variations to the above theories. For instance, the mannequin shown at the start seems to crawl up in a lot of people’s theories about it. What method was taken it will not please everybody and with the hype of expectation the bar can only crawl higher so let’s hope it’s a good one.
Quite like the dreaded ‘second album syndrome’ of the music business the sequel in the movie industry can make or break a franchise. In 2009 Guy Ritchie step away from his usual gangster genre (while we step away from the Madonna jokes) and directed a new take of the Sherlock Holmes story. Following that release the movie was well received from audiences, critics and most importantly by the diehard fans of Sherlock Holmes. It was gritty, dark and much more appealing to the twenty first century than the Peter Cushing series of the sixties.
Now the recent update, titled Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, follows the similar line to its predecessor but jumps bounds in terms of the storyline. Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) is investigating a series of seemingly unrelated events that are occurring around Europe and believes them all to be connected to his nemesis Professor Moriarty (Jared Heart). Dr Watson (Jude Law) is preparing for marriage to his beloved Mary (Kelly Reilly) and is no longer a resident of Baker Street. However as a result to Sherlock’s probing into Moriarty’s affairs the crime solving duo are driven into an action packed pursuit across the continent encountering gypsies, bullets and a comical donkey.
Like most of Ritchie’s works the casting is always a highlight. Jared Heart’s Moriarty is spine tingling dark. His unemotional faces along with a pair of piercing gloomy eyes underline the evilness of the character and the major theme of the story, that theme being there will (always) be consequences to the disruption of his plans. The other most notable addition to the film was the introduction of Stephen Fry as Sherlock’s older and more astute brother Mycroft. Who better to niggle at Sherlock’s supremacy than Britain’s most beloved quizmaster.
The problem however with this instalment is that despite having the material to be a Sherlock story it doesn’t feel like it is being portrayed as one. The little rewind moments to show how Sherlock foresight gets the upper hand over a foe can be a little bit ludicrous at times and the audience is often left wondering if Sherlock’s actions were always intended and built up or were his actions quickly scribbled by the writers as an easy was out to his (and their) predicament. In this way A Game of Shadow does not live up to its predecessor.
Alas however the detective and ‘whose done it?’ genre is always an impossible one to portray and get right on screen. As it may say Sherlock on the tin it will probably be best to consider it as nothing more than a thrilling action movie that is good humoured and is about understanding the uniqueness of boyish friendship. Law and Downey play off each other very well and in a Sherlock movie with little detecting that is what is needed. To me the most outstanding parts about it are the interactions between Holmes and Moriarty. These scenes are intense, well-acted and pay a honourable homage to the famous rivalry.
So if it’s the crime solving Holmes you’re looking for than this isn’t for you and I would wholeheartedly recommended the BBC series now on Sunday nights (or Basil the Great Mouse Detective).
Last month I like many other men around the world spent the time looking like a registered member of a naughty list. The well named charity event ‘Movember’ has now distinguished itself as a traditional event every year and is growing in popularity since its creation. As this was my fifth year participating I decided to look into the origins of the event and I was left pleasantly surprised to find the boyish manner for which it was founded on.
Unlike the heart-warming stories of other charities you would find on an Oprah special the idea for Movember was first pitched over a drunken conversation in an Adelaide pub in 2003. Skulling pints while watching the world go by, Luke Slattery and Travis Garone began discussing the pretentiousness manner of the trend of fashion comebacks and how the moustache had yet to be involved.
So with the hope of the Mo revival Luke and Travis convinced a couple of mates into growing a moustache for one month and with that, Movember was born. In 2003, just 30 Mo Bros took part. The rules were simple; start on Movember 1st clean shaven and spend the remainder of the month growing a Mo. No money was raised, the idea was simply to see who could grow the better moustache.
After the success of its maiden year the founders decided to use their Mo growth as a force of good. They knew that men, particularly old-school macho types, did not get regular health check-ups and sometimes even ignored signs of a medical problem. So they decided to use Movember to raise awareness, and maybe some cash, for men’s health issues.
They discovered Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (PCFA) and learned that one in every six men would get prostate cancer during his lifetime. One in 36 would die from the disease. Behind lung cancer, prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men but at the time it wasn’t making headlines as much as other cancers were.
That November, 450 guys, called the Mo Bros, grew moustaches and asked their friends and families to sponsor their growth. By the end of the month, they’d raised $55,000 and gave it to the PCFA. It was the largest single donation the foundation had received at the time.
Today men (& women) from all continents take part in Movember to help raise thousands for many charity organisations. The organisation has ambassadors such as Joe Jonas, Justin Bieber (for both occasions one wonders why?) Cake, Snoop Dogg, and basically every rugby player in both hemispheres.
It has been two weeks since this year’s event has passed and few Mos survived the changing of the month. Most Magnums, pencils and imperialists’ moustaches have met their end and been sacrificed to the loo water gods. There is though that one style that every man tries out before it is all gone and that is the ‘Hitler’.
Interesting Mo Fact: In the British Army between 1860 and 1914 it was a regulation that every soldier had to have a moustache. If you shaved it off, you could be imprisoned.
Even though it was only a long weekend away to London the fact that it was to be my first holiday in quite some time meant that it was going to be a very a special trip. In honour of the occasion I had gone all out. I had booked a hotel opposite Hyde Park and decided that I would fly with Aer Lingus, foregoing all my student cheap mentality. Everything was planned weeks in advances and the night before I packed my bag at least three times. I was ready and very excited.
However like many of the best laid plans in life things started to go astray on the day. The Aircoach that was to take me to the airport was late and was nowhere to be seen. As the minutes started to tick by it became clear that it the dooming solution to all was becoming more apparent. I would have to get a taxi.
Now I have no problems taxis but because I live in the suburbs the chances of seeing a taxi driving by in mid-morning is slim and safest bet in getting one quick is to call a taxi company. My local taxi company is Southside cabs and although their service is great and quick I have the unfortunate honour of always ending up with the weirdo driver.
Before that day the previous driver I had was a strange short chap who was on man mission to destroy Radio 1’s Joe Duffy. As he drove me to my destination he filled me in on his ludicrous plan on how he was going to out Joe’s supposed homosexuality on-air. Then my journey with Southside Cabs before that involved my driver telling me the top ten reasons of how the modern woman is quite like a computer. This was a man and a list that I had happily forgotten about until a few weeks later that same taxi driver made an appearance on Tv3’s version of ‘Take Me Out’ with that same list as his party piece. With these memories in mind I hoped and prayed to the taxi gods that the one coming to pick up was going to be normal.
When the taxi pulled up I thought I my prayers had been answered. My driver Patrick seemed like a proper nice bloke. He was polite, helpful and strangely cheerful for the early hour that was in it. This was of course all change when I made the faux pas of stating that I was flying with Aer Lingus.
“Patrick HATES Aer Lingus.”
This was the starting point of a conversation that led down to a list of the many things that Patrick the taxi driver hates. Ryanair, Bureau de Change, Budapest trannies and most importantly the French were all touch upon in his little rant. As he spiralled into his contempt for everything and everyone I found myself in an agreeable loop of a simple “Yep” as I became more concerned at the quickly rolling meter before me.
Eventually though as we edged ever closer to the airport the conversation fell to brighter pastures. Patrick loves his steaks and gave me a couple of good tips. The first was to use two pans. He said that one pan should be extremely hot so that it sears the steak and the other pan set medium heat to cook. His second tip was to use vegetable oil as it had a lower boiling point than olive oil and I was to smear the entire steak rather than drizzling it on the pan. It was sound advice.
When we arrived at the airport Patrick knocked off €10 from the bill and stated something about a “special”. I was well chuffed at this first but the more I thought about my simple repetitive “Yep” the more I began to think that he was referring to me as “special”.
What a prick.
(Coming soon: The wanders in Terminal 2)